This article comes at a perfect time. I’m at the beginning of a dispute that has all the markings of this operating architecture functioning where I’m needing to request documentation of the ‘ attributable acts’ that determined the charged personal liability. Thank you for providing the understanding and verbiage I can use to wade through this.
This is interesting to me primarily because it seems that not only are people gaining knowledge about how to proceed in their specific case but also that it seems courts are siding with them. My question is whether *judges* are waking up to this problem along with their case people. Could we see a situation where increasing pushback by knowledgeable claimants ends up pushing the judicial system to hold for them more and more often, until finally the administrative agencies begin to figure out ways to make acts attributable more efficiently so they will stop losing in court? It could happen.
This article comes at a perfect time. I’m at the beginning of a dispute that has all the markings of this operating architecture functioning where I’m needing to request documentation of the ‘ attributable acts’ that determined the charged personal liability. Thank you for providing the understanding and verbiage I can use to wade through this.
So true !
This is interesting to me primarily because it seems that not only are people gaining knowledge about how to proceed in their specific case but also that it seems courts are siding with them. My question is whether *judges* are waking up to this problem along with their case people. Could we see a situation where increasing pushback by knowledgeable claimants ends up pushing the judicial system to hold for them more and more often, until finally the administrative agencies begin to figure out ways to make acts attributable more efficiently so they will stop losing in court? It could happen.