Ask them by FOIA, how much of our taxes go to their pensions. My sister organises accounts for many QCs in this country (all asleep). She previously organised pensions for Devon County Council, about 10 years ago and at this time, she informed me that a whopping 27% of Devon constituents' council tax payments went into the pension pots of civil servants working within Devon County Council. It may be different now but it's probably more! That's something that requires investigation. Why should we, on our knees pay their pensions and while I am at it, why should over 350 MPs be able to claim all their utility bill fees as expenses? We are being robbed. Still waiting for a letter from our Council for non-payment of fees. Have a lengthy list of what they don't do as a reason for why we will continue to withold monies....
Apologies for the long post but, use this and apply directly to the Court.
The Magistrates’ Courts (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2021
As follows: in Rule 66
“
Request for information about a case
66B.—(1) This rule applies where anyone, including a member of the public or a reporter, requests information about a case.
(2) A person requesting information must—
(a)
ask the designated officer;
(b)
specify the information requested; and
(c)
pay any fee prescribed.
(3) The request—
(a)
may be made orally or in writing, and need not explain why the information is requested, if this rule requires the designated officer to supply that information; but
(b)
must be in writing, unless the court otherwise permits, and must explain why the information is requested, if this rule does not so require.
(4) Subject to paragraph (5), the designated officer must supply to the person making the request—
(a)
the date of a hearing in public;
(b)
in general terms, the subject of the proceedings;
(c)
the court’s decision at a hearing in public;
(d)
whether the case is under appeal;
(e)
the identity of—
(i)
the parties,
(ii)
the parties’ representatives, including their addresses, and
(iii)
the judge, magistrate or magistrates, or justices’ legal adviser by whom a decision at a hearing in public was made;
(f)
such other information about the case as is required by arrangements to which paragraph (6)(c) refers; and
(g)
details of any reporting or access restriction ordered by the court.
(5) The designated officer must not supply the information requested if—
(a)
the supply of that information is prohibited by a reporting restriction;
(b)
that information is the date of a hearing in public of which a party has yet to be notified;
(c)
that information concerns proceedings determined by the court without notice to—
(i)
a party to those proceedings, “
I would be grateful if the provisions of this legal obligation are taken into account when assessment is made of this matter and all due weight is given to compliance with the law on this occasion.
As the council have applied for costs with regards to this liability order then this brings within the purview of the law the calculation and approval of the said costs which have been agreed between the council and the court and therefore the identities of the officers are obliged to be disclosed under 66 4. e)
------------ - -
Ask for the breakdown of the costs ( from the council under FOI and the Court ) and match them to the Nicholson vs Haringey ruling. If you find staff costs for departments other than council tax then that is unlawful, if you find bad debt added back then this is also unlawful. You then bring this to the attention of the councils 151 Officer.
Ideally all this should be done at the summons stage and you simply ask for adjournments whilst you are compiling your case
Quite simply, heroic. This corrupt, despicable system of unconscious criminality has to be dismantled. For the sake of civilisation. You are a true leader.
I agree with all of these comments by lovely people in response to the continuation of your saga---such an incredible opportunity to teach us all, especially those violating others! Your strength and integrity continues to inspire us all!
Learn to set your own law and press a claim by way of trespass in your own court instead of filing a complaint in theirs. I am learning about this much simpler and more straightforward process and very much want everyone who desires to learn to do the same. Discover how to make the games stop here: https://thesovereignsway.com/?link=5499
Best wishes on your continued stand for freedom. We are all behind you 100%.
Great job Martin. Sincerely hoping you achieve your goals. I enjoy reading your articles.
Evil begets evil re: corrupt government & their lackeys. I'm proud of you in taking a stand!!!
Ask them by FOIA, how much of our taxes go to their pensions. My sister organises accounts for many QCs in this country (all asleep). She previously organised pensions for Devon County Council, about 10 years ago and at this time, she informed me that a whopping 27% of Devon constituents' council tax payments went into the pension pots of civil servants working within Devon County Council. It may be different now but it's probably more! That's something that requires investigation. Why should we, on our knees pay their pensions and while I am at it, why should over 350 MPs be able to claim all their utility bill fees as expenses? We are being robbed. Still waiting for a letter from our Council for non-payment of fees. Have a lengthy list of what they don't do as a reason for why we will continue to withold monies....
Thank you Martin as always! So enjoy reading about this - you are a hero for all of us to emulate by standing up and saying NO MORE! <3
Apologies for the long post but, use this and apply directly to the Court.
The Magistrates’ Courts (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2021
As follows: in Rule 66
“
Request for information about a case
66B.—(1) This rule applies where anyone, including a member of the public or a reporter, requests information about a case.
(2) A person requesting information must—
(a)
ask the designated officer;
(b)
specify the information requested; and
(c)
pay any fee prescribed.
(3) The request—
(a)
may be made orally or in writing, and need not explain why the information is requested, if this rule requires the designated officer to supply that information; but
(b)
must be in writing, unless the court otherwise permits, and must explain why the information is requested, if this rule does not so require.
(4) Subject to paragraph (5), the designated officer must supply to the person making the request—
(a)
the date of a hearing in public;
(b)
in general terms, the subject of the proceedings;
(c)
the court’s decision at a hearing in public;
(d)
whether the case is under appeal;
(e)
the identity of—
(i)
the parties,
(ii)
the parties’ representatives, including their addresses, and
(iii)
the judge, magistrate or magistrates, or justices’ legal adviser by whom a decision at a hearing in public was made;
(f)
such other information about the case as is required by arrangements to which paragraph (6)(c) refers; and
(g)
details of any reporting or access restriction ordered by the court.
(5) The designated officer must not supply the information requested if—
(a)
the supply of that information is prohibited by a reporting restriction;
(b)
that information is the date of a hearing in public of which a party has yet to be notified;
(c)
that information concerns proceedings determined by the court without notice to—
(i)
a party to those proceedings, “
I would be grateful if the provisions of this legal obligation are taken into account when assessment is made of this matter and all due weight is given to compliance with the law on this occasion.
As the council have applied for costs with regards to this liability order then this brings within the purview of the law the calculation and approval of the said costs which have been agreed between the council and the court and therefore the identities of the officers are obliged to be disclosed under 66 4. e)
------------ - -
Ask for the breakdown of the costs ( from the council under FOI and the Court ) and match them to the Nicholson vs Haringey ruling. If you find staff costs for departments other than council tax then that is unlawful, if you find bad debt added back then this is also unlawful. You then bring this to the attention of the councils 151 Officer.
Ideally all this should be done at the summons stage and you simply ask for adjournments whilst you are compiling your case
Quite simply, heroic. This corrupt, despicable system of unconscious criminality has to be dismantled. For the sake of civilisation. You are a true leader.
I agree with all of these comments by lovely people in response to the continuation of your saga---such an incredible opportunity to teach us all, especially those violating others! Your strength and integrity continues to inspire us all!
Martin,
Learn to set your own law and press a claim by way of trespass in your own court instead of filing a complaint in theirs. I am learning about this much simpler and more straightforward process and very much want everyone who desires to learn to do the same. Discover how to make the games stop here: https://thesovereignsway.com/?link=5499
Best wishes on your continued stand for freedom. We are all behind you 100%.
https://theinfowar.tv/watch?id=6396384453877719376fc018 anyone needing hope for the future & confirmation we are winning big time, watch this especialy from 16minutes.
With you All The Way.
They will, eventually, beg you to forget the whole thing. That's the nature of cowards.
Sick e'm Martin! You're on the right side of the law, as you know!
Can you imagine the meetings upon meetings they are having to discuss this?
Epic trolling, Martin. Keep up the good work.