Michael Humble court complaint
Public exposure of the police and judicial misfeasance against a UK homeless veteran
As part of work I am doing to publicise the case of Michael Humble, and related police and judicial corruption, I am putting out a copy of the formal complaint written on 12th September 2024 and submitted to the court service. As of today, 17th December, no response has been received.
Michael Humble has faced significant persecution, both public and private, for standing for what he believes to be the truth. His experiences include:
Legal Harassment
Convicted of harassment after raising concerns about COVID-19 measures at his son’s school, despite claiming his actions were to expose crimes against children.
Charged with resisting arrest under questionable circumstances, including missing or tampered evidence and an improperly documented warrant.
Procedural irregularities in his appeals, including unexplained delays, ignored court orders, and lack of communication, raising suspicions of systemic corruption.
Intimidation by Authorities
Allegations of police collusion with his son’s mother and school staff to silence him, including orchestrated harassment and intimidation.
Subjected to violent arrests, strip searches, and mistreatment while in custody, including being pepper-sprayed and physically assaulted.
Threats and intimidation of his parents, including physical incidents at their home.
Personal Consequences
Alienation from his son, whom he has seen for only a few minutes in years, reportedly due to manipulative actions by authorities and family
Homelessness since 2017, living in a tent or a self-built shack, often facing extreme hardship and isolation.
Loss of employment opportunities and community support, exacerbated by his outspoken stance.
Public Persecution
His activism and claims have drawn significant backlash, including being labeled a troublemaker or criminal for challenging government policies, COVID-19 measures, and technological infrastructures like 5G.
Surveillance, intimidation, and public smear tactics, including encounters with drones, false accusations, and harassment at key events.
Michael's persecution underscores a broader struggle between his commitment to truth and the systemic forces he believes are working to suppress dissent. Despite immense personal, emotional, and physical hardship, he remains steadfast in his convictions, seeking justice and accountability while enduring significant suffering.
Formal Complaint
I formally request an investigation into a prima facie case of corruption involving the court and alleged collusion between the court, police, and CPS. This is to cover up attempted and actual murder by individuals in positions of authority. This complaint is based upon multiple serious procedural irregularities, and evidence of crimes of malfeasance and/or misfeasance in a public office.
I was charged with harassment of my son’s school staff because of my efforts to expose war crimes, murder, terrorism, assault, and genocide via bio-chemical weapons and psychological warfare. These alleged crimes were conducted through lockdowns, contaminated face masks, nanotech PCR tests, and Covid bioweapon injections. The complaint is about unlawful case handing, not these matters. That said, potentially lethal attacks upon children set the gravity of the context, and why conscience demands full accountability.
On 28th July 2023 I was convicted of a harassment charge at Newton Aycliffe Magistrates' Court (11/SS/06029/22). The Court would not allow any of the prosecution witness statements to be tested, and refused to accept the defence to harassment, denying the very existence of the relevant text in legislation (Harassment Act 1997). This refusal to acknowledge relevant statutes may indicate criminal misconduct from the bench, and possible collusion in organised crime.
This harassment conviction was appealed on 11th August 2023, and the handling of the case has not followed normal procedure, which raises justifiable concerns over the Northern Court Circuit and its potential complicity in these serious crimes. No communication of any kind has been received in over a year on this case, and this demands investigation and explanation. Justice delayed is justice denied.
I was also charged with a second offence, resisting arrest, on 20th May 2023 (11/SS/03201/23), and convicted at Newton Aycliffe Magistrates’ Court on 23rd June 2023, which was immediately appealed on 10th July 2023. Again, regardless of the merits of the accusation, or my alleged improper treatment in custody, there have been procedural irregularities that require explanation.
The arrest warrant lacked demonstrated provenance, and the digital warrant later provided had its metadata removed. To date there is no named man or woman accountable for the warrant. The CPS also refused to the defence the document showing that the arrest was done lawfully, again raising suspicion of illegality to protect related authorities.
Most serious is how the appeal for this second case has been procedurally mishandled. This appeal was filed on 8th February 2024, and a trial date was initially set for 14th April. A “mention to be fixed” moved the trial date to 30th May. I turned up, with my witnesses, but the defence barrister was unable to proceed, so the trail date was set back again to 9th August.
Meanwhile, I received a letter inviting me to a pre-trial hearing on 9th July. While in attendance, I presented the prima facie evidence of serious criminality by the authorities, who have a duty to investigate, yet have not. At this hearing, the CPS attempted to have that trial date quashed and moved to another time. The Judge emphatically ordered that the date not to be changed, as there had been sufficient delays, and the trial was to go ahead on 9th August.
In the interim, there was no communication from the court. Based on the judge’s order, I turned up anyway at Durham Crown Court on 9th August, with both witnesses and public observers. (15-20 people came, as this is a matter of public interest, being a miscarriage of justice around the most serious breaches of public trust by authorities.) However, the case was not listed, and we were politely turned away by security staff.
We have received no explanation of why the date was changed, or the name of the judge who denied the CPS an adjournment, nor details of any judge who may have overruled this order, and authorised a change to the trial date subsequently — in direct contradiction of the previous order. Neither have I been been provided a new trial date. This apparent abuse of the court system and weaponisation of court listing can be seen as contempt of court, which is a crime.
The failure to manage this case, given its political implications, is indicative of criminality in the court system to cover up war crimes. I also have legal aid, but no local lawyer will represent me, as they appear to fear repercussions. My claim is that I am being intimidated by police and the courts because I have exposed them failing to investigate and prosecute mass murder. A such, these matters deserve thorough investigation, not only as a personal matter of justice, but in the wider public interest.
In light of the evidence provided, I hereby formally request a comprehensive investigation and clear explanations regarding:
1. Whether the judge in the harassment case broke the law and their oath of office by actively denying a defence, to cover up a crime.
2. Whether the arrest warrant was properly authorised, and if the Court broke the law by denying the defence access to evidence, knowing this was aiding or abetting a crime.
3. How the listing of the hearing on 9th August was mismanaged, why the trial did not go ahead, and who (if anyone) authorised any change in contravention to the Judges’ orders on both 30th May and 9th July.
