Indeed: "And it allows the public to witness—perhaps for the first time—the vast distance between the law as promised and the process as practiced." I find it unsurprising given current events but nonetheless utterly appalling.
bypass the adversarial courtroom model …..this is a deliberate display of money making by barristers & solicitors, both are officers of the court and both are obliged to put the court will all relevant knowledge. Thus if one side omits something the other is obliged to fill the gaps, they have obligations to do this, any withholding or deception by omission is contempt
Indeed: "And it allows the public to witness—perhaps for the first time—the vast distance between the law as promised and the process as practiced." I find it unsurprising given current events but nonetheless utterly appalling.
You've hit the target dead-center, Martin. Bullseye !
bypass the adversarial courtroom model …..this is a deliberate display of money making by barristers & solicitors, both are officers of the court and both are obliged to put the court will all relevant knowledge. Thus if one side omits something the other is obliged to fill the gaps, they have obligations to do this, any withholding or deception by omission is contempt