They steal our peace (only if we let them)

The ungodly acts of courts, police, and snitches drain away the energy of our society

As we entered the Magistrates’ Court building there was the obligatory metal detector and three security guards — a gentler woman whose humanity still seemed to be intact (barely), as well as two men who seemed thoroughly indifferent to the public they notionally serve. We were then asked to register at the desk, where a grey-haired man in a black cape asked us if we were press, as I was holding a notebook. No, I replied, we are just observers for a case involving a friend of a friend, and I gave the name of the defendant. We were ushered into a side waiting area away from the main court attendees, where after a few minutes the same older man approached us.

“Are you here for the traffic case? It has been dismissed for lack of evidence.”

I thanked him for looking after us (always be grateful if you can), and we exited the building. One of the security guards, whose excessive size made him look like he had won a gold medal at Eating for England, gave us an odd glance. I think we Anons have a vibe that disturbs the forcefield in these places. They know we are different in how we carry ourselves; the dark energy of these “injustice factories” cannot touch us, even if we can feel it and recoil from it. It doesn’t mean everything that happens here is wrong — many people doing bad things are rightly held to account — just “they” don’t work for the people, but for the legal-banking cartel that rules over us.

The full detail of the case last week can wait for another day, as it deserves an article of its own. A member of the defendant’s family was driving, we genuinely don’t know who, and someone else made an accusation to police using dashcam footage. Apparently there is a hobby of making such accusations to ruin people and feel better about yourself, regardless of the merit of the case or quality of the evidence, and it is jamming up the legal system. Over a million motorists have been harassed through the courts on non-existent offences or trivial infractions. I suspect that close to none of these drivers would ever be convicted if a jury of one’s peers was involved, so the purpose of it is clearly not justice.

In this case, the defendant has a very sick and disabled family member needing constant care, after a medical incident that ruined a young life. The prosecution waited until the very last moment to withdraw, yet it was clear long ago there was no case to answer, as they have no evidence of a crime. I learned that if the authorities don’t have your car registration number in the photographs or video, then it is inadmissible anyhow, as it cannot be proven to be you. Data that has been copied off a memory stick is in fact hearsay evidence, not the original, and could have been modified. Yet the damage is done — “the punishment is the process” — with six months of constant stress and distraction.

I face the same thing this very day with my own battle against Cumbria Constabulary, who have a prima facie case of criminal fraud to face themselves. They have not followed procedure, and know they have no real case, but are weaponising the legal system to punish me for exposing them and holding them to account. I may “win” on the first round or on appeal, but again the damage is done — no about of money can really compensate me for the loss of my freedom to spend my days as I wish and travel as I prefer. I caused no loss or harm to anyone, and it is inconceivable that any jury would convict for these non-existent crimes. The system is designed to suck out your energy, either as money, or in time. You cannot win, only limit losses.

There is ample evidence that the rotten system is collapsing under the weight of its own corruption. Yet we have to be careful, as there is a godly remit for the law, and just because there are abuses, even ones that are normalised, it doesn’t mean that every act is illegitimate. It may be under duress, but I did sign up for a driving license, rather than exercise my right as a common law traveller, and I did register my conveyance as a “vehicle” and not as a private carriage. By my performance I have arguably consented to their quasi-public system of law enforcement under maritime law. Even in a debt slave system, punishments against a genuine wrongdoer are sometimes appropriate, regardless of whether there is perfection in the chain of righteous authority.

Hence in my own case against Cumbria Constabulary, I will argue one charge (obstruction) as being within the remit and discretion of the court — but they should dismiss it due to the facts (signs covered in vegetation) and legality of conviction (case law says not to in this circumstance). However, the other charge I argue is outside the remit of the court to convict, as Cumbria Constabulary are guilty of the very thing they accuse me of — failing to provide authenticated identity information. To hold me to their rule, when they themselves break it, is to create fundamentally different standards, and that breaches foundational principles of natural law beyond mere statute.

I believe we have to endure these experiences, and learn how to persevere despite their painful burdens, so that we build a testimony about the true nature of our legal system, and why such transformational changes to our society are needed. Only a jury of one’s peers can act as a counterbalance to a cabal of order followers who collude, even if tacitly, to serve the interest of their paymasters. For me to seek remedy against Cumbria Constabulary for malicious prosecution is only to further energise their competitive system, and waste my life force in the pursuit of monetary damages. It guarantees ongoing breach of my own peace, no matter what the outcome, so it is a trap.

By encouraging and sustaining malevolent accusers and false witnesses, without serious repercussions for these moral outrages, these courts are draining the life energy out of our communities. That said, there is a job to be done, and a question of how to do it. Right opposite the court the roadside grass is all churned up with a bush demolished, and I have seen what is likely the same teen e-biker wrecking the local park similarly. I don’t want to spend my life on juries dealing with minor behavioural issues like this — they should be for grave matters only. Something has to change: either a spiritual revolution in society to stop the selfishness, or an authoritarian crackdown to induce fear of consequences, or a return to justice meted out locally under ancient methods

The spiritual lesson I am gaining is to “hold the line” and not let these institutions steal my peace. The defendant in last week’s cancelled case never got the satisfaction of a judge saying there was no case to answer, and likely will get no costs or compensation for his wasted effort. His vulnerable child has been denied attention and aid that cannot be recompensed. The injustices are by design — we are at war, but it is a spiritual and energetic war, not a kinetic one. How much we allow these institutions to invade our psyche and occupy our thoughts is a choice. The only “win” is to be at peace, a 5D beacon of light, no matter what happens in the 3D world. That’s the impact we have when the security guards sense we’re not like the others there.

Nonetheless, there are 3D problems that have 3D solutions. The courts are really not fit for purpose in this digital age. Every action they take should go on the blockchain, so it cannot be repudiated. Every case should have a URL, so we can reference it and the status — so we know it has been withdrawn. Every event should be a trigger we can subscribe to and act upon. Every deadline should have optional reminders to act in time. Every document submitted should be given a receipt. Every case file should be searchable by all interested parties. Every human judgment can be quality-checked by AI. Every claimant’s legal identity should be authenticated digitally, especially public bodies, servants, and corporations, to prevent the kind of ultra vires legal simulations I am confronting.

Patriots are about to be handed enormous responsibility in reconstructing our world after a legal and financial restart. We can only know what needs to be fixed and how if we have the experience of how it was broken before. By reframing these frustrating endeavours as being preparation for that rebuilding era, and not fights against irrelevant incumbents, it takes away the sting of injustice. That they behave this delinquent way is a feature, not a bug — we can be grateful for the lessons we are being taught. Ironically, one can learn more about the spirit of the law from being a victim of its failure modes than you can from years in law school. Just don’t let them steal your peace while on the training course — they can take your time, money, even jail you. But your peace is yours to keep, unless you give it away.

Someone is spreading joy everywhere they go