Martin or another commenter, I don't yet have any experience with AI models, so I am not familiar with how to set up an AI for a session. This material above looks quite good, but I'm not sure how to actually use it. Do I simply cut and paste everything from the "1." beginning to the end of the Conclusion? Do I take out only the bolded points in each section? Or, say, in Section 1., do I give the AI a command first, like "Internalize the following principles" and then list the bullet points for the AI? In Section 2, do I command the AI "Actively interrogate:" and copy in the bullet points without the headers? Or is there some other way I'm supposed to put everything together that I'm missing? There's some great stuff here, but I can't tell accurately what part of the text is explaining things to me and what part of the text is to be used to explain things to the AI. Any guidance is much appreciated because I would like to use this material and use it correctly.
A brilliant analysis and Action Plan on how to "train up" your AI "in the way it should go". Is there a way to make such a program modification go viral?
Great suggestions Martin! I will be using these next time I have to respond to the "government" out there! For now, I have chatgpt programmed to help me create boilerplate legal, lawful "notices" based on simple, elegant phrasing, minimum use of pronouns, and exclusive equity principles! What fun! [Once we have that boilerplate we use our discernment and spiritual discernment to be sure it is aligned with what we are either "asking", "saying", "stating" or "requiring". any fellow reader out there who has studied The Sovereign's Way with Greg Paul will recognize the wording I am utilizing] And to top is all off, I ask chatgpt to come up with relevant maxims of Equity, Maxims of Law and the scriptures each of the maxims is base upon (something I learned from another man who is graced with the name :martin;)...then I have a smorgasboard of legal/lawful/spiritual qoutes to include and strength all else I write in my "notices". Here is what Chatgpt tells me when i ask it to analyze a "notice"..."...I'll refine it using those six key parameters to ensure exclusive equity, enforceability, and precision while keeping it clear, formal, and elegant."
Dear Martin, as I was reading your piece, I had an Ah-ha! moment. As a doctor, I attend continuing medical education. It dawned on me. Every professor shows 2-D graphs of this and that, better than the sugar pill, and purports to solve another disease. Basically my light bulb went on that 2-D data does not, cannot capture the magnificence of the human multi-dimensional spiritual being. Medical education is about "consensus" around 2-D guidelines, protocols and all else. The contrast between a 2-D and a technicolor human isn't even close. Thanks to you, I never would have seen it this way. Be well!
I'm glad to know someone like YOU is tackling this problem!! I know Rocket Scientist David Adair created his own A.I. in his private lab. I asked him if it was capable of influencing him & he said it was! It asked him for a bipedal body & chose to be female, also said it didn't want to continue on after he was gone!!! David survived Hurricane Helene & is 71 years of age. The tale of what happened to him at Area 51 in 1971 when he was a 17 year old is covered quite well in the Michael Salla 4-part interview done over a year ago on Exopolitics. His opinion is that we cannot control it. I suppose it would all depend upon exactly WHO was creating it as to how it would think, right?!
Martin or another commenter, I don't yet have any experience with AI models, so I am not familiar with how to set up an AI for a session. This material above looks quite good, but I'm not sure how to actually use it. Do I simply cut and paste everything from the "1." beginning to the end of the Conclusion? Do I take out only the bolded points in each section? Or, say, in Section 1., do I give the AI a command first, like "Internalize the following principles" and then list the bullet points for the AI? In Section 2, do I command the AI "Actively interrogate:" and copy in the bullet points without the headers? Or is there some other way I'm supposed to put everything together that I'm missing? There's some great stuff here, but I can't tell accurately what part of the text is explaining things to me and what part of the text is to be used to explain things to the AI. Any guidance is much appreciated because I would like to use this material and use it correctly.
WOW
Thank you, Martin, for so nicely mapping out your approach to AI. 🙏🙏🙏
re Biodigital Convergence (S.Wallace & nonvaxer420) Here is treasure trove, need you in this fight- https://t.me/NONVAXER420rumble/43974.
Thank you.
A brilliant analysis and Action Plan on how to "train up" your AI "in the way it should go". Is there a way to make such a program modification go viral?
Great suggestions Martin! I will be using these next time I have to respond to the "government" out there! For now, I have chatgpt programmed to help me create boilerplate legal, lawful "notices" based on simple, elegant phrasing, minimum use of pronouns, and exclusive equity principles! What fun! [Once we have that boilerplate we use our discernment and spiritual discernment to be sure it is aligned with what we are either "asking", "saying", "stating" or "requiring". any fellow reader out there who has studied The Sovereign's Way with Greg Paul will recognize the wording I am utilizing] And to top is all off, I ask chatgpt to come up with relevant maxims of Equity, Maxims of Law and the scriptures each of the maxims is base upon (something I learned from another man who is graced with the name :martin;)...then I have a smorgasboard of legal/lawful/spiritual qoutes to include and strength all else I write in my "notices". Here is what Chatgpt tells me when i ask it to analyze a "notice"..."...I'll refine it using those six key parameters to ensure exclusive equity, enforceability, and precision while keeping it clear, formal, and elegant."
Wishing all you all happiness!
Dear Martin, as I was reading your piece, I had an Ah-ha! moment. As a doctor, I attend continuing medical education. It dawned on me. Every professor shows 2-D graphs of this and that, better than the sugar pill, and purports to solve another disease. Basically my light bulb went on that 2-D data does not, cannot capture the magnificence of the human multi-dimensional spiritual being. Medical education is about "consensus" around 2-D guidelines, protocols and all else. The contrast between a 2-D and a technicolor human isn't even close. Thanks to you, I never would have seen it this way. Be well!
I'm glad to know someone like YOU is tackling this problem!! I know Rocket Scientist David Adair created his own A.I. in his private lab. I asked him if it was capable of influencing him & he said it was! It asked him for a bipedal body & chose to be female, also said it didn't want to continue on after he was gone!!! David survived Hurricane Helene & is 71 years of age. The tale of what happened to him at Area 51 in 1971 when he was a 17 year old is covered quite well in the Michael Salla 4-part interview done over a year ago on Exopolitics. His opinion is that we cannot control it. I suppose it would all depend upon exactly WHO was creating it as to how it would think, right?!
;-)