...in appreciation for this 'dive' with GROK...two observations Martin made that synchronize with my 'understanding' of this world we created/are creating:
I'm less interested in a compilation of themes or claims than with seeing if Grok can correlate any claims with events or materials that come to us after the claims are made.
Lots of people online are interesting to read, but are they actually posting useful information or inside information that is grounded in truth, or is it all just clickbait?
Was there any material before their claim that could have helped them develop the claim and call it new info? Or any material that did not arrive before the claim is made but did appear afterward in a way that could be considered confirmation?
Can that kind of analysis be done and get reliable information, Martin? Or is that even too difficult for Grok?
...in appreciation for this 'dive' with GROK...two observations Martin made that synchronize with my 'understanding' of this world we created/are creating:
...accelerated evolution of information access;
...critical thinking amid alleged corruption
Thanks Martin!
I'm less interested in a compilation of themes or claims than with seeing if Grok can correlate any claims with events or materials that come to us after the claims are made.
Lots of people online are interesting to read, but are they actually posting useful information or inside information that is grounded in truth, or is it all just clickbait?
Was there any material before their claim that could have helped them develop the claim and call it new info? Or any material that did not arrive before the claim is made but did appear afterward in a way that could be considered confirmation?
Can that kind of analysis be done and get reliable information, Martin? Or is that even too difficult for Grok?