Can't say enough how proud I am of your brains, beauty and tenacity! Where would the world be without you! I've followed you from nearly the beginning of your online musings.....possibly 2018? Your thoughts and suspicions were similar to mine. I know it's absolutely exhausting fighting for truth and justice. My situation is in a different arena, Texas, FDA, Big Pharma, although it's all interconnected. I know you've wondered how did I get here? I know I sure have. God placed you here for such a time as this and will refresh your weary soul. Take that to the bank! ☺️
Thank you for your tenacity Martin🙏👍👍it was never going to be easy an battle but sitting back and hoping all will be well would be naive at best.
The biggest fraud possibly ever committed against humanity was the C19event and the gene therapy products that were injected into billions without consent.
The best video to date I have seen on the fraud is on utube:
English Constitution Party
Graham Moore speaks to Dr David Martin ------.
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆🤝
And please read the Exercise Pegasus pandemic preparedness documents 🇬🇧
No6 on the list:
"Test the strategic response to disinformation and misinformation"
This is an interesting summary to some of my previous questions. It seems that Family County and Crown Court systems are all properly constituted and labelled. Provided the laws instituting/constituting them are properly written and cannot easily be subverted by bureaucrats, this takes these problems off the table for these systems.
Further, even though it appears the constituting legislation that Parliament adopted for the Magistrates court system is lacking in certain respects, only some of the LJAs are affected by that set of oversights. It would seem to me that at least technically, the LJAs that are not operating properly can fix their issues without the Parliament having to fix the originating law(s), simply by fixing their own naming conventions. Is that correct, Martin, or is Parliamentary action required to fix these problems? It's just an oversight in application, not a fundamental flaw in the constituting legislation?
To my eyes the deeper question remains - Was the constituting legislation deliberately fault-creating (a feature, not a bug) so that the Magistrates court system and its "judiciary" and administrative staff could slyly streamline the system to become a revenue-raising con job divorced from the rule of law?
Is the misnaming issue the only issue and easily fixed once seen by all simply by properly naming everything, or are there deeper problems in the magistrate court system that affect *all* LJAs (even the properly named ones) in order to maximize the filching of funds from the people? With the former, Martin, you are correcting an oversight that all should be willing to correct once it is exposed, while with the latter, you are uncovering systemic fraud knowingly created by Parliament and executed by bureaucrats and void tribunals in all LJAs. The former is a mistake, while the latter is, might we say, treason(?).
Can't say enough how proud I am of your brains, beauty and tenacity! Where would the world be without you! I've followed you from nearly the beginning of your online musings.....possibly 2018? Your thoughts and suspicions were similar to mine. I know it's absolutely exhausting fighting for truth and justice. My situation is in a different arena, Texas, FDA, Big Pharma, although it's all interconnected. I know you've wondered how did I get here? I know I sure have. God placed you here for such a time as this and will refresh your weary soul. Take that to the bank! ☺️
Thank you for your tenacity Martin🙏👍👍it was never going to be easy an battle but sitting back and hoping all will be well would be naive at best.
The biggest fraud possibly ever committed against humanity was the C19event and the gene therapy products that were injected into billions without consent.
The best video to date I have seen on the fraud is on utube:
English Constitution Party
Graham Moore speaks to Dr David Martin ------.
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆🤝
And please read the Exercise Pegasus pandemic preparedness documents 🇬🇧
No6 on the list:
"Test the strategic response to disinformation and misinformation"
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
This is an interesting summary to some of my previous questions. It seems that Family County and Crown Court systems are all properly constituted and labelled. Provided the laws instituting/constituting them are properly written and cannot easily be subverted by bureaucrats, this takes these problems off the table for these systems.
Further, even though it appears the constituting legislation that Parliament adopted for the Magistrates court system is lacking in certain respects, only some of the LJAs are affected by that set of oversights. It would seem to me that at least technically, the LJAs that are not operating properly can fix their issues without the Parliament having to fix the originating law(s), simply by fixing their own naming conventions. Is that correct, Martin, or is Parliamentary action required to fix these problems? It's just an oversight in application, not a fundamental flaw in the constituting legislation?
To my eyes the deeper question remains - Was the constituting legislation deliberately fault-creating (a feature, not a bug) so that the Magistrates court system and its "judiciary" and administrative staff could slyly streamline the system to become a revenue-raising con job divorced from the rule of law?
Is the misnaming issue the only issue and easily fixed once seen by all simply by properly naming everything, or are there deeper problems in the magistrate court system that affect *all* LJAs (even the properly named ones) in order to maximize the filching of funds from the people? With the former, Martin, you are correcting an oversight that all should be willing to correct once it is exposed, while with the latter, you are uncovering systemic fraud knowingly created by Parliament and executed by bureaucrats and void tribunals in all LJAs. The former is a mistake, while the latter is, might we say, treason(?).