Martin, you are on a serious hot streak here. Once you have the "framing" options clarified and the analysis process set up, could you take *any* custody case and decide whether it was (1) properly done, (2) mistaken, (3) improperly biased against return to status quo ante, or (4) a railroad job committing plagium? If so, then you are going to become the child's protector's new best friend and make a decent living income helping to protect children *and* potentially identifying and helping to take down networks that are using family courts to commit plagium.
Fascinating Martin. Please keep going. You're most definitely a National and International Treasure whether you like it or not.
These documents will help other people in the future.....thank you.
Martin, you are on a serious hot streak here. Once you have the "framing" options clarified and the analysis process set up, could you take *any* custody case and decide whether it was (1) properly done, (2) mistaken, (3) improperly biased against return to status quo ante, or (4) a railroad job committing plagium? If so, then you are going to become the child's protector's new best friend and make a decent living income helping to protect children *and* potentially identifying and helping to take down networks that are using family courts to commit plagium.