What you're asking for is impossible. Any truthful answer is a defacto admission they have no legal standing. Also, any legislative remediation would be too difficult to achieve without bringing the automated punitive surveillance system into public scrutiny.
They argue that it is a judicial adjudication in the ABSENCE of any countervailing claim and relies on ignorance, apathy and fear for its result.
If you don’t stand up for your rights then you don’t have any!
I would also say that Parliament do not actually ‘vest judicial power’ as you have said because judicial power comes not from Parliament but from the constitutional separation of powers
Brilliant "..John Entick did not undermine the English legal system by insisting that the State show its warrant before ransacking his home. He strengthened it, by reaffirming a simple test that has endured for centuries: lawful power must be traceable to lawful authority."
Martin, I'll bet you would be a great moonshiner, the way you boil things down to their most purely distilled essence. Keep that in mind if you get back to the hills and mountains of Tennessee. :-D :-D :-D
My father's hillbilly forebears outfoxed the revenuoors in West Virginia more than once upon a day. :-)
Your intellect of course run circles around all of them. As in, combined IQ.
I suspect we will read of the impact of your legal challenges in history books to come.
What you're asking for is impossible. Any truthful answer is a defacto admission they have no legal standing. Also, any legislative remediation would be too difficult to achieve without bringing the automated punitive surveillance system into public scrutiny.
May I apologise for my negativity...
They argue that it is a judicial adjudication in the ABSENCE of any countervailing claim and relies on ignorance, apathy and fear for its result.
If you don’t stand up for your rights then you don’t have any!
I would also say that Parliament do not actually ‘vest judicial power’ as you have said because judicial power comes not from Parliament but from the constitutional separation of powers
Brilliant "..John Entick did not undermine the English legal system by insisting that the State show its warrant before ransacking his home. He strengthened it, by reaffirming a simple test that has endured for centuries: lawful power must be traceable to lawful authority."
Martin, I'll bet you would be a great moonshiner, the way you boil things down to their most purely distilled essence. Keep that in mind if you get back to the hills and mountains of Tennessee. :-D :-D :-D
My father's hillbilly forebears outfoxed the revenuoors in West Virginia more than once upon a day. :-)