This is how the FDA and CDC here in the US could control the good people within their organizations while the organizations approved and orchestrated mass murder. Many good and intelligent people were controlled by the "All vaccines are safe and effective" mantra of the vaccine religion. Others were systematically and systemically coerced into going along to get along or lose their jobs. Others were willing to speak up but were targeted and destroyed. US hospitals and doctors enlisted in the core movement, avoided protocols that worked, used protocols that created death. Retirement and residential facilities had their populations targeted for infections and deadly vaccines. Red state populations were targeted with "hot" vaccine lots. The UK's national health service engaged in deliberate actions to kill their patients with Midazolam. Millions were killed all over the world, tens of millions maimed.
99% of the people who did the killing would have been considered good people in any other context, but they were enslaved and did evil and are still doing evil at levels worse than the Holocaust.
A few bad eggs can't explain that, though clearly they were an aggravating factor.
The enormous scale of the killing was always and only enabled by The Machine.
The truly mind-numbing realization here is that The Machine was literally *everywhere* we looked. Virtually every single institution, government, corporation, healthcare company and provider, NGO, major media, schools, doctors and nurses, parents, everything and everyone either pushed the killing or bowed to the pressure, either pushed the murder or became the murderer.
The avowed mystics held the arbitrary, unaccountable “will of God” as the standard of the good and as the validation of their ethics. The neomystics replaced it with “the good of society,” thus collapsing into the circularity of a definition such as “the standard of the good is that which is good for society.” This meant, in logic — and, today, in worldwide practice — that “society” stands above any principles of ethics, since it is the source, standard and criterion of ethics, since “the good” is whatever it wills, whatever it happens to assert as its own welfare and pleasure. This meant that “society” may do anything it pleases, since “the good” is whatever it chooses to do because it chooses to do it. And — since there is no such entity as “society,” since society is only a number of individual men — this meant that some men (the majority or any gang that claims to be its spokesman) are ethically entitled to pursue any whims (or any atrocities) they desire to pursue, while other men are ethically obliged to spend their lives in the service of that gang’s desires.
I quote from Galt’s speech: “There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or nonexistence — and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it dies; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of ‘Life’ that makes the concept of ‘Value’ possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.”
To make this point fully clear, try to imagine an immortal, indestructible robot, an entity which moves and acts, but which cannot be affected by anything, which cannot be changed in any respect, which cannot be damaged, injured or destroyed. Such an entity would not be able to have any values; it would have nothing to gain or to lose; it could not regard anything as for or against it, as serving or threatening its welfare, as fulfilling or frustrating its interests. It could have no interests and no goals.
These created "institutions" are no different than the "immortal robot". No value structure, therefore no morality, yet populated by the ignorant or avaricious. What could go wrong when avarice and ignorance are combined under a pseudo-immortal environment? Welcome to the NOW!
Paul Levy describes this as Wetiko (in his book of the same name). It is a mind virus of the dark collective unconscious that will do what it needs to keep going. It's function is to prod the light to take action - for us to see and correct the same disease in ourselves -and so increase the light (consciousness) and functionality of the system.
"Any living network that becomes sufficiently complex will become self-organizing and will demonstrate an instinct to perpetuate itself, to survive. ...the pathological system will distribute its resources to support behavior that mirrors its own internal logic and thus ensures its survival. Unless the illness is accurately diagnosed and properly treated, the prognosis is always fatal. This is to say that we are called to confront the destructive effects of our relationship to money and power."
YES!!
This is how the FDA and CDC here in the US could control the good people within their organizations while the organizations approved and orchestrated mass murder. Many good and intelligent people were controlled by the "All vaccines are safe and effective" mantra of the vaccine religion. Others were systematically and systemically coerced into going along to get along or lose their jobs. Others were willing to speak up but were targeted and destroyed. US hospitals and doctors enlisted in the core movement, avoided protocols that worked, used protocols that created death. Retirement and residential facilities had their populations targeted for infections and deadly vaccines. Red state populations were targeted with "hot" vaccine lots. The UK's national health service engaged in deliberate actions to kill their patients with Midazolam. Millions were killed all over the world, tens of millions maimed.
99% of the people who did the killing would have been considered good people in any other context, but they were enslaved and did evil and are still doing evil at levels worse than the Holocaust.
A few bad eggs can't explain that, though clearly they were an aggravating factor.
The enormous scale of the killing was always and only enabled by The Machine.
The truly mind-numbing realization here is that The Machine was literally *everywhere* we looked. Virtually every single institution, government, corporation, healthcare company and provider, NGO, major media, schools, doctors and nurses, parents, everything and everyone either pushed the killing or bowed to the pressure, either pushed the murder or became the murderer.
Excerpts: The Objectivist's Ethics; Ayn Rand, UW Madison, Feb. 9, 1961
The avowed mystics held the arbitrary, unaccountable “will of God” as the standard of the good and as the validation of their ethics. The neomystics replaced it with “the good of society,” thus collapsing into the circularity of a definition such as “the standard of the good is that which is good for society.” This meant, in logic — and, today, in worldwide practice — that “society” stands above any principles of ethics, since it is the source, standard and criterion of ethics, since “the good” is whatever it wills, whatever it happens to assert as its own welfare and pleasure. This meant that “society” may do anything it pleases, since “the good” is whatever it chooses to do because it chooses to do it. And — since there is no such entity as “society,” since society is only a number of individual men — this meant that some men (the majority or any gang that claims to be its spokesman) are ethically entitled to pursue any whims (or any atrocities) they desire to pursue, while other men are ethically obliged to spend their lives in the service of that gang’s desires.
I quote from Galt’s speech: “There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or nonexistence — and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it dies; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of ‘Life’ that makes the concept of ‘Value’ possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.”
To make this point fully clear, try to imagine an immortal, indestructible robot, an entity which moves and acts, but which cannot be affected by anything, which cannot be changed in any respect, which cannot be damaged, injured or destroyed. Such an entity would not be able to have any values; it would have nothing to gain or to lose; it could not regard anything as for or against it, as serving or threatening its welfare, as fulfilling or frustrating its interests. It could have no interests and no goals.
These created "institutions" are no different than the "immortal robot". No value structure, therefore no morality, yet populated by the ignorant or avaricious. What could go wrong when avarice and ignorance are combined under a pseudo-immortal environment? Welcome to the NOW!
Paul Levy describes this as Wetiko (in his book of the same name). It is a mind virus of the dark collective unconscious that will do what it needs to keep going. It's function is to prod the light to take action - for us to see and correct the same disease in ourselves -and so increase the light (consciousness) and functionality of the system.
"Any living network that becomes sufficiently complex will become self-organizing and will demonstrate an instinct to perpetuate itself, to survive. ...the pathological system will distribute its resources to support behavior that mirrors its own internal logic and thus ensures its survival. Unless the illness is accurately diagnosed and properly treated, the prognosis is always fatal. This is to say that we are called to confront the destructive effects of our relationship to money and power."