Are you informed of the rate of charge before entering a ulez zone so you can decide whether to enter or find an alternative route🤔
Is all the signage correct and clearly displayed🤔
A comment has been posted about wether the council print the summons for withholding CT payment or wether it is contracted out, possible data breach and may have other implications.
Every action taken by the government to restrict movement over the C19 event had no lawful basis and neither does ULEZ , definition of a scam: "a dishonest scheme"
Alison Wright (substack) has some great content and needs more coverage of the potential fraud she is looking in to with regards to our elected 🤣 officials💩👍
He who brings the case must prove the case. The adjudicator must be reminded that the burden of proof is upon whoever is bringing this case and they must substantiate that the pollution caused by your vehicle is different to that caused by the self same vehicle with a slightly different body configuration.
In order to do this one of the doctrines of equity must be enacted which is form over function . What is the actual intent of this law? What was in the mind of government when it passed this law? Surely they were looking to limit emissions and therefore the question must be posed as to how finding one engine that pollutes exactly the same as the other based upon the body shell surrounding it Must be nonsensical to the point of being absurd . If this were in a magistrates court then access to equity would be via section 148 of the magistrates court act which denotes that the court is a court of common law, subsequent to the Judicature act of 1873 and 1875 says that equity is to be used in all courts however is this adjudication even a court?
We were examining the de Crittenden ruling earlier this week and it would seem that the judge only dealt with the matter of “fines” and consequently may not have considered the matter of forfeiture which forms part of the case . May be some further reading is required to establish whether this is a reasonable argument that can be made...
👍🤝
Are you informed of the rate of charge before entering a ulez zone so you can decide whether to enter or find an alternative route🤔
Is all the signage correct and clearly displayed🤔
A comment has been posted about wether the council print the summons for withholding CT payment or wether it is contracted out, possible data breach and may have other implications.
Every action taken by the government to restrict movement over the C19 event had no lawful basis and neither does ULEZ , definition of a scam: "a dishonest scheme"
Alison Wright (substack) has some great content and needs more coverage of the potential fraud she is looking in to with regards to our elected 🤣 officials💩👍
He who brings the case must prove the case. The adjudicator must be reminded that the burden of proof is upon whoever is bringing this case and they must substantiate that the pollution caused by your vehicle is different to that caused by the self same vehicle with a slightly different body configuration.
In order to do this one of the doctrines of equity must be enacted which is form over function . What is the actual intent of this law? What was in the mind of government when it passed this law? Surely they were looking to limit emissions and therefore the question must be posed as to how finding one engine that pollutes exactly the same as the other based upon the body shell surrounding it Must be nonsensical to the point of being absurd . If this were in a magistrates court then access to equity would be via section 148 of the magistrates court act which denotes that the court is a court of common law, subsequent to the Judicature act of 1873 and 1875 says that equity is to be used in all courts however is this adjudication even a court?
We were examining the de Crittenden ruling earlier this week and it would seem that the judge only dealt with the matter of “fines” and consequently may not have considered the matter of forfeiture which forms part of the case . May be some further reading is required to establish whether this is a reasonable argument that can be made...