Are you a cartel theorist?

The nature of the criminality we face is systemic, so the language we use matters

When a trusted friend says I need to watch a video, knowing how averse I am to the medium, it generally means there is something very important that I should know. This case was no exception, as it informs both my general understanding of the geopolitical justice situation around us all, as well as personal battles that are relevant to me and my family. It is under ten minutes and on TikTok, the link is below. I will summarise the key points after the link, so if now is not a good time, don’t worry.

The presenter talks about how America was infiltrated via the courts and legal system, but specifically touches upon how military jurisdiction is used to deal with treason, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The US Marine Corps at locations like Guantanamo Bay is prosecuting international crime cartels, not just ordinary criminal conspiracies. Cartels are treated and prosecuted as a single entity, so once you have attached yourself to one, you all go down together. This is more significant than I had previously realised.

Many of us have been reviled and ostracised under the label “conspiracy theorist”, a mind control tool to shut down critical examination of high-level crime. Forget for a moment that we may be “conspiracy analysts” rather than “conspiracy theorists”, and instead focus on the framing of this being about conspiracies. A conspiracy is a relatively bounded endeavour in scope and time, whereas a cartel is not in the same way. Cartels are designed to sustain crime beyond single episodes. Is our problem one of conspiracies (isolated bad in a generally good government) or cartels (organised and institutionalised criminality by the state)?

To bring this to life, imagine a scenario where your child goes to a private school, which is funded by a rich family friend, as you are too poor, being a dissident writer. The school decides to promote Covid gene therapies to the children, blanket recommending them to all. As a parent, you point out to the school head the lack of safety testing, their failure to inform of the experimental nature of such therapies, as well as limited value to suppress symptoms and not viral transmission. The school head ignores your warnings, and you respond putting them on notice they are committing war crimes of a Nuremberg trials level of seriousness. At this point, by continuing, the school management have joined the criminal cartel, and can be prosecuted as such.

Then suppose you attempt to withdraw your child from the school, but the rest of your family close ranks to prevent this — we “cannot disrupt the child’s education [even if it kills them or other children]”. You ask the school head if they are insured for your child to attend, even if you have withdrawn permission for your child to be there, and you are stonewalled. There is self-evidently negligence and a lack of duty of care. The rich family friend continues to fund your child going the school against your wishes, even when warned that genocide may be involved. Again, the family friend has attached themselves to the cartel; they don’t get a personal trial for aiding a conspiracy. If you lay down with Nazis, dine with Nazis, and do business with Nazis, then you’re a Nazi.

The video above touches on situations like familial child trafficking, where one parent breaks a custody order to take the child away from the “conspiracy theorist”, using a biased court to cover for the crime as it being in the “best interests” of the child. I have seen and heard of this situation many times in both the UK and USA, and it doesn’t need a “conspiracy” to coordinate between parties. Well, in this circumstance, all involved, including officers of the court (attorneys aiding perjury and deprivation of rights, judges who ignore and aid trafficking) are part of the crime gang. When they justify their acts based on you, for instance, being a whistleblower (like a nurse who sees organ harvesting in hospitals), then they become an extension of those crimes against humanity.

“I cannot believe anyone would allege that hospitals are murdering and butchering people for money! How can this parent be fit to look after a child with such outlandish conspiratorial beliefs! Plus the kid is sick of these stories and wants to live with me now!” is what allies you to the murderers and butcherers. By attacking “cartel theorists” in family court, and weaponising their own children against them, these sociopaths put themselves into international military jurisdiction, with the extremely severe penalties that implies. The last four years have been a sting operation to get as many criminals as possible to attach themselves to the cartels, not realising that rigged civilian courts are irrelevant; this is a wholly different level of evil that is being purged from our society.

When I turned up at Peterlee Magistrates Court over a year ago, having notified everyone that crimes were being committed, and had the court’s legal advisor commit fraud, and judges break their oath, then they all became part of the crime cartel that steals on behalf of councils (if they had not long ago done so). When the cartel is an agent of a foreign power waging acts of war, you become an enemy combatant out of uniform, and your rights shrink down to approximately making a brief prayer (if lucky) before you exit this world. A lot of overconfident fools who never thought they would be held to account are going to get the shock of their lives.

So in summary, I am not a conspiracy theorist, after all. Nor a conspiracy analyst, apt as it may sound. For that matter, I am not even a cartel theorist, as these criminal enterprises are being practically observed all around me! Now I can see my job as being a cartel analyst, actively exposing these corrupt people. We “Anons” are being used as “bait” for low-level cartel enablers to make bad moves. Our correspondence and court transcripts are building the clean evidence trail for the military to take them all out at once. It doesn’t even have to be our own military, as international human rights law applies. How many corrupt UK judges ever expected Russian, Turkish, or Egyptian troops to turn up and haul them to justice? None, I would guess.

Perhaps they ought to study the law? 🤔