It has been a long time since I recorded a video. I generally prefer essays—they’re less demanding to produce and more precise. But I’m breaking that policy today to introduce something that may justify the effort: the “Absolute Zero Protocol”.
This is a doctrine of lawful resistance to unlawful conduct by criminal courts in England and Wales. It’s jurisdiction-specific, but the underlying logic travels well. The core principle is simple: absolutely zero tolerance for deviation from the statutory rules by those who wield authority.
When the state demands absolute compliance from the public, yet exempts itself from the same rules, it becomes a lawless regime in disguise. The Absolute Zero Protocol (AZP) is a direct response: it pushes the system into procedural freeze—because when every reply is incriminating, and the automated pipeline breaks, the machine stalls.
This video isn’t a full tutorial. That would take templates, filings, and walk-throughs. What I’m offering here is the essence:
Use all of the lawful tools, in all of the permitted ways, against all of the infractions—without exception or negotiation.
At some point I may release a PDF guide that lays out my case methodically. But this short briefing should be enough to understand the principle. AI plays a central role, because none of us are insider experts. These systems were designed to be opaque. We now have the means to decode them.
Let me be absolutely clear: this protocol is for one circumstance only—when the authorities are operating outside their lawful remit. That means void proceedings (no jurisdiction) or defective initiations (no standing). These are binary failures. There is no discretion involved. If it’s merely a mistake inside a lawful process, use standard appeals and complaints. AZP is not for that.
And yes, I assume by now HMCTS and the Crown Prosecution Service are watching this. My message to you is simple: knowingly running void proceedings is a crime. There is still a narrow window to seek forgiveness and correction. But it is closing. The Single Justice Procedure is generating null convictions at scale. Pull the emergency brake now, because the crash will be far worse.
As for me—I am unusually positioned. I’ve lost my former life to persecution for opposing corruption. I’m technically proficient, funded by the public, and trained in information warfare. That means I’m probably the first person to simultaneously invoke Section 142, Case Stated, Judicial Review, and Crown Court Appeal to attack a conviction from every angle. I won’t be the last.
The behaviour of the state—running ghost courts, ignoring service rules, evading statutory obligations—is borderline criminal. So this isn’t about one activist with a grievance. Others will follow, because they must. The denial of the most basic right—a real court, clearly constituted—is intolerable in any lawful society.
I am not your problem. I am just the messenger of consequences.
Key Messages from the AZP Video
Void Proceedings Are Not Errors—They Are Legal Nullities
When a court that doesn't lawfully exist initiates proceedings, those actions are void ab initio. This isn't about correcting mistakes—it's about confronting systemic illegality masquerading as due process.The 'Absolute Zero Protocol' Is Lawful Resistance to Unlawful Courts
This doctrine enforces zero tolerance for deviations from statutory procedure by state actors. It treats the justice system's own rules as sacred, using them to expose ghost courts and unlawful prosecutions.AZP Is Not Sovereign Citizen Theory—It’s Code-Based Counterforce
Unlike fringe movements rejecting legal systems wholesale, AZP operates entirely within the statutory game. It leverages every available procedural mechanism to highlight internal contradictions and systemic collapse.Four Legal Tools Used in Parallel
The protocol involves the simultaneous use of:Judicial Review – To challenge procedural illegality via the High Court.
Section 142 – To reopen void or defective convictions.
Case Stated – To force lower courts to explain unlawful decisions to higher courts.
Crown Court Appeal – As a reserved, final-stage retrial mechanism.
This full-spectrum legal escalation is unprecedented in its coordination.
Narrative Warfare and AI Deconstruction Are Central
Every document issued by the court is treated as a battleground. Using AI, their contents are forensically analysed to uncover breaches, omissions, and contradictions—then used to escalate procedurally and expose criminality.JusticeSec: A New Modeled Discipline
Drawing on concepts from infosec, the protocol introduces “JusticeSec”—a doctrine of reverse attack surface auditing applied to the judicial system. The goal: not destruction, but restoration of lawful operation.Clean Case Optics Allow Maximum Strategic Leverage
This challenge arises from a parking matter—an offence with no victim and purely procedural character. That clarity makes it the perfect vehicle to reveal how deep the rot runs.Open Source Audit of Systemic Failure
Every move is public. Every filing is documented. This isn’t private litigation—it’s a public accountability protocol that others can replicate. The prosecution has created a dissident with lawful standing and unlimited escalation tools.The Courts Have One Last Exit: Obey the Law
The message to HMCTS and CPS is unambiguous: if you knowingly run void proceedings, you're committing crimes. The time to repent is finite. AZP is the emergency brake before collapse.
Share this post