Thank you so much for all you're doing. I've been following Graham Moore too who is following the English Constitution path in court. The system is trying everything it can to delay, block and deflect true justice and lawful remedy. Your health comes first and we need you fit and well, above all else. Please don't hesitate to ask for any help you need in any form. You have so much to be proud of and so many friends who will support you come what may. ❤️
Getting prepped for council tax hearing next month
• Oral Opening Draft (3 Mins): “Your Worships, this summons 645923 is void: Headed by non-existent EAST HAMPSHIRE MAGISTRATES COURT, it drops £25 to admit £70 fraud, yet clings to £45—568% over £6.73 reasonable. Per Powys, CTAER demands JP issuance, not delegated fiction. Witnesses must explain; grant relief to end £2.4m scam.”
• Cross-Exam Questions (Thornton-Dale/Allen):
1. “Confirm EHMC existence—why header if hearing at PMC?”
2. “Who signed 645923? JP or delegated? Evidence of ‘individual case’ review (2010 letter)?”
Thank you so much for all you're doing. I've been following Graham Moore too who is following the English Constitution path in court. The system is trying everything it can to delay, block and deflect true justice and lawful remedy. Your health comes first and we need you fit and well, above all else. Please don't hesitate to ask for any help you need in any form. You have so much to be proud of and so many friends who will support you come what may. ❤️
Getting prepped for council tax hearing next month
• Oral Opening Draft (3 Mins): “Your Worships, this summons 645923 is void: Headed by non-existent EAST HAMPSHIRE MAGISTRATES COURT, it drops £25 to admit £70 fraud, yet clings to £45—568% over £6.73 reasonable. Per Powys, CTAER demands JP issuance, not delegated fiction. Witnesses must explain; grant relief to end £2.4m scam.”
• Cross-Exam Questions (Thornton-Dale/Allen):
1. “Confirm EHMC existence—why header if hearing at PMC?”
2. “Who signed 645923? JP or delegated? Evidence of ‘individual case’ review (2010 letter)?”
3. “Why omit £25 LO cost—admit £70 unlawful?”