Martin, that's a very interesting analogy, and it does make everything crystal clear. You're certainly doing everything possible to give this group of people and entities a cheap and easy way out of the mess they are in charge of and participating in. You've also said that many of these people read this substack. If so, then at some point, if the fix is not applied, does the situation turn toxic and become malfeasance - or worse?
We (our data) ultimately are "the product" in the fith industrial Revolution.
And in part will give value to the CBDC , digital ID is an integral part along with live tracking of movement and surveillance of the human stock.
With eyes open ,this can be seen at every level in the 🇬🇧
The great reset: they have to destroy what is in place now to be able to build the new world they have planned.
Tony Blair institute /Larry Ellison etc etc etc and many millions of 🇺🇸 $ are pouring in and the NHS is also heavily involved as it is a government agency that holds colossal data which can easily be derandomised.
For a whole multitude of reasons it will likely go very badly wrong.
SSLL, one of Martin's attitudes that I really like is that he first assumes that when shown the proof, at least some people will step up and act to correct a bad situation. His recent work gets us pretty much to the final point of this generous approach. We will see what happens. Of course, with psychopaths who only want power, we can reliably depend on them to act as you are saying. I think Martin is right to try this one (probably last) move to see if the good people involved will step up and do what is needed to fix the problem. He is thinking things through to obvious and simple answers now, and those answers deserve their time in the sun.
Completely agree with what you say and one of the reasons I try and engage on other social media platforms is to try to incourage debate about main stream naratives.
Many who have had the courage to do so have paid a price for there actions but staying silent when one becomes aware of a crisis is not a good solution.
We must have the courage and self belief to step out from the shadows and revel in the beauty of our light.
...What a beautiful question to pose to the "court"....now, we set the intention in a disciplined way so that "lexworthiness" is an everyday word that is understood by most all! It has just become a word in my computer's memory. Will be adding this definition to my Primordial Equity Lens. HO!
Is the question being the check for tribunal's jurisdiction?
If there is no "the lexworthiness certificate" - there is no jurisdiction where the tribunal can operate, and therefore no authority to ask any questions and expect any answers.
Martin, that's a very interesting analogy, and it does make everything crystal clear. You're certainly doing everything possible to give this group of people and entities a cheap and easy way out of the mess they are in charge of and participating in. You've also said that many of these people read this substack. If so, then at some point, if the fix is not applied, does the situation turn toxic and become malfeasance - or worse?
I hope they choose the easy road here.
We live under a spell (interesting word) and our "belief" in the false reality in which we live is what gives the spell life.
The biggest fear is that we awaken from our sleep and see the deception.
They will not "choose the easy road" 👍🤝
I suspect you are correct, SSLL, but I can hope even while remaining awake to see when(if) they do not.
They have one basket and all the eggs are in it.
We (our data) ultimately are "the product" in the fith industrial Revolution.
And in part will give value to the CBDC , digital ID is an integral part along with live tracking of movement and surveillance of the human stock.
With eyes open ,this can be seen at every level in the 🇬🇧
The great reset: they have to destroy what is in place now to be able to build the new world they have planned.
Tony Blair institute /Larry Ellison etc etc etc and many millions of 🇺🇸 $ are pouring in and the NHS is also heavily involved as it is a government agency that holds colossal data which can easily be derandomised.
For a whole multitude of reasons it will likely go very badly wrong.
SSLL, one of Martin's attitudes that I really like is that he first assumes that when shown the proof, at least some people will step up and act to correct a bad situation. His recent work gets us pretty much to the final point of this generous approach. We will see what happens. Of course, with psychopaths who only want power, we can reliably depend on them to act as you are saying. I think Martin is right to try this one (probably last) move to see if the good people involved will step up and do what is needed to fix the problem. He is thinking things through to obvious and simple answers now, and those answers deserve their time in the sun.
Have great respect ,
Martin at present is my only paid subscription.
Completely agree with what you say and one of the reasons I try and engage on other social media platforms is to try to incourage debate about main stream naratives.
Many who have had the courage to do so have paid a price for there actions but staying silent when one becomes aware of a crisis is not a good solution.
We must have the courage and self belief to step out from the shadows and revel in the beauty of our light.
🌕 🤝👍
...What a beautiful question to pose to the "court"....now, we set the intention in a disciplined way so that "lexworthiness" is an everyday word that is understood by most all! It has just become a word in my computer's memory. Will be adding this definition to my Primordial Equity Lens. HO!
Is the question being the check for tribunal's jurisdiction?
If there is no "the lexworthiness certificate" - there is no jurisdiction where the tribunal can operate, and therefore no authority to ask any questions and expect any answers.
Am I reading this right, Martin?