This is an amazing 'break down'--and as a result of your dedication, you are helping to truly break it all down...and we are eternally grateful for your brilliant insights--as someone who feels a concern about AI technology, I see this as using this 'tool' for GOOD for ALL
I feel that Jack Posobiec & Joshua Lisec have converged on a similar point in their book “Unhumans”.
There Marxism, Socialism & Communism are all viewed as tactics rather than ideologies. The focus of the tactics is, I understand, essentially criminal, even satanic.
Thank you very much for propounding a critique of Marxism that focusses on criminality.
But how does AI come up with statistics for criminality--at the liminal edges--at .001%? If there has been no meaningful analysis of criminality within the system--and there would be layers of criminality as well--but then what criminality are we speaking of--? Criminality is like a pyramid scheme with lots of players getting pieces--and if we don't know those numbers because they haven't been uncovered, then how does AI factor them?
The basic argument is reason discourse--make an argument that Marx deflected and failed to account for criminality and this is pretty much what I would have come up with. It is a useful argument but girding underneath this all seems to be the premise that AI is smarter than we are--and I for one don't accept that. We should, however, take up the challenge and begin to do our own reason discourse arguments!
A brilliant - and long overdue - reconceptualization. Thank you for pulling the Marxian curtain back and revealing the criminal essence at the heart of it all !
hey Martin ... have you ever read Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII encyclical published in 1891?
It's super 'dense', written in 'high' Jesuitese, but it actually lays the (skewed) 'religio-philosophical' foundation for both fascism and marxism. Cleverly written of course, you have to read between the lines but it's all there to my eyes.
And looking at the Rothschild's connection to Marx (funding) and the fact that they've been working on behest of the Papacy since 1832 as "guardians of the papal treasure"; the church's well known involvement w/ Hitler .. and Mussolini as well of course ... well it gets pretty juicy
Very nice work, Martin. I could only wish your work here could permanently "infect" the AI for everyone else. Alas, I don't believe it will. However, it is a great explanation. Clarifying.
This is an amazing 'break down'--and as a result of your dedication, you are helping to truly break it all down...and we are eternally grateful for your brilliant insights--as someone who feels a concern about AI technology, I see this as using this 'tool' for GOOD for ALL
Thank you so much!
I feel that Jack Posobiec & Joshua Lisec have converged on a similar point in their book “Unhumans”.
There Marxism, Socialism & Communism are all viewed as tactics rather than ideologies. The focus of the tactics is, I understand, essentially criminal, even satanic.
Thank you very much for propounding a critique of Marxism that focusses on criminality.
But how does AI come up with statistics for criminality--at the liminal edges--at .001%? If there has been no meaningful analysis of criminality within the system--and there would be layers of criminality as well--but then what criminality are we speaking of--? Criminality is like a pyramid scheme with lots of players getting pieces--and if we don't know those numbers because they haven't been uncovered, then how does AI factor them?
The basic argument is reason discourse--make an argument that Marx deflected and failed to account for criminality and this is pretty much what I would have come up with. It is a useful argument but girding underneath this all seems to be the premise that AI is smarter than we are--and I for one don't accept that. We should, however, take up the challenge and begin to do our own reason discourse arguments!
A brilliant - and long overdue - reconceptualization. Thank you for pulling the Marxian curtain back and revealing the criminal essence at the heart of it all !
Informative, thanks Martin.
Good vs evil.
hey Martin ... have you ever read Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII encyclical published in 1891?
It's super 'dense', written in 'high' Jesuitese, but it actually lays the (skewed) 'religio-philosophical' foundation for both fascism and marxism. Cleverly written of course, you have to read between the lines but it's all there to my eyes.
And looking at the Rothschild's connection to Marx (funding) and the fact that they've been working on behest of the Papacy since 1832 as "guardians of the papal treasure"; the church's well known involvement w/ Hitler .. and Mussolini as well of course ... well it gets pretty juicy
https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum.html
Very nice work, Martin. I could only wish your work here could permanently "infect" the AI for everyone else. Alas, I don't believe it will. However, it is a great explanation. Clarifying.
Martin 2.0 ?