Blogs scaled attention. Social media fragmented it. Patron platforms stabilised it. AI now overwhelms it — producing more signal than the audience model can absorb.
I, too, have experienced what you’re talking about here. The odd limbo between how we used to work and produce output (articles, books, etc) and where we are now when it feels like a lot of (perhaps) wasted effort to continue to demand that kind of product from ourselves when something more immediate- and often more concise - is available to us. But I think that effort is what’s required as a valid starting place. The true wonderings and wanderings a of a human mind are the fruits of Creation. Whereas AI can only take what already exists and work with that.
I agree that AI (when used properly) can take our thoughts and find the thing at the heart of them that we, ourselves, are trying to express but may be missing…our own forests for our trees.
I don’t know how this all pans out either. But here we are. And we each do the best we can with it, I think.
I’ve been reading your content for years. And your book is in my personal, tangible collection. Thank you for what you do. Your insights and vulnerability throughout this process have helped many people and you are very much appreciated.
I,myself, love and resonate most with your "soul pain" journeys. My experience of the last years is so deeply painful and alienating I sometimes( but not always) think I won't find any equilibrium ever again. It's not that I wish to read about your pain but I feel some connectedness with my journey. I am an empath. Those who are not empaths will never feel and what "we" feel and frankly I wouldn't wish them to. So here we are....
I read every post, regardless of content. Your writing ability is so good that I find it a pleasure to read, even if the subject sometimes isn't something that I'd usually read. And all posts come into my email inbox, regardless of sender/account. And I had my car stolen in Whitby.
I sense you are germinating something new. Let it grow inwardly first.
I have cast about with Substack, recently deleting all political material and consciously deciding to only put out essays generated by my heart center.
I have imported some of my “inspired writings” because they fit the bill, but it will take a bit of distillation to sense this new direction and produce.
I have always resonated with your “painful soul journeys”, as others have mentioned. The Way is narrow, dark and lonely, and just hearing another’s struggles with that is invaluable.
I was an avid follower of Q in the 2018-2020 period, but now have fallen away from all such pursuits back into radical academic detachment.
But Q was the gestalt in which I found your writings, and that is meaningful.
Personally, I got most out of your Q articles, and now, your use of AI to fight the corrupt system (for a lack of better words.) Your articles on how to use AI in your court battles have taught me so much and helped me with my legal issue. If you want my two cents, I would like to see more about how to use AI to combat and fight back from the school board level to the national level. Mostly the local level, since most politics and corruption is local.
Besides that, well done Martin. I wish you many successful ventures in the future.
I enjoy your personal pieces the most, since the struggle is real for all of us so in some ways your journey reflects ours. The longer & sometimes (imo) pretty technical pieces I tend to skip through. What I'm really after is evidence of progress and perhaps even sightings of potential endgame in this now achingly long Q-op saga. I honestly expected the phone to ring by now, with OG anons being contacted by White Hat Military Intel and recruited into paid civilian positions to backfill holes left following cabal arrests, resignations, suicides, etc. Hasn't happened though, has it? Not yet at any rate. So far we have simply been 'used' as an unpaid audience; else who would there be to appreciate and perhaps record the immense effort going into this extended movie? OK, I hope that answers your first two questions. As for the others: 3. I notice 'very little' about how information is being created and used, sorry! 4. Maybe a book ... dunno, I'm such a luddite, lol!?
I like the "mix" of all that you create...and I read most everyone of your posts a.k.a. blogs...then I skip some becuase I am busy focused elsewhere and those get archived. Your adventures into the world of the "courthouse and legalese" along with your, I will call them HOW TOs, methods to get the most and best out of partnerships with AI are quite helpful. I am in agreement that "AI can be a partner in refinement." Long and short of it...all you are doing is accepted with much GRATITUDE!
I once asked one of my brothers what I do in the world, my specific talents. Without hesitation, he said, "You read, and you think." I've been struck since by the *lack* of something he did not say, which is of course, "and you share what you think."
After 6 years of taking care of my elderly mother (who died several weeks ago at the age of 101 years old), I have literally hundreds of tasks and projects that have been postponed, held in abeyance until I (now) can get to them.
Part of what I've been noodling on for some time now (and it is now a current noodling) is how do I take all that I read about ("take in") and think about, and turn it into something useful shared with others, *without* getting totally bogged down in all the "processing" overhead of operating a method of sharing. This is especially an issue because I am a generalist and have many interests, some of which appeal to one group and some of which appeal to other groups.
In reading your post above, I see you voicing similar concerns, though from a much more active and out there situation.
The Future Forecasting Group has recently completely revamped their website (ffgrv.com) to try to solve that problem. And in a lot of ways, I think they have one good way to do it. I keep coming back to the old website approach, where someone can personalize and develop many different threads, but it also needs a space for a community. Even more important, though, the person needs to have AI-level help to remove the massive drudgery that is inherent in the old "personal website" website approach.
I'm currently stopped from adding, "and sharing" to the end of "You read, and you think" because the thought of spending the massive amount of time simply curating the website threatens to derail everything I most want to spend time on. So "and sharing" isn't going to happen any time soon.
I think I need a network that is based on my own (peculiar) website containing a layered community within it, and supported by a network of social media "collection points" to point people toward the many different threads of thought and interest and sharing on the central hub which is the website, which carries 2 functions: archiving all my thoughts/articles/podcasts and providing a place for engagement with readers.
Unfortunately, I don't know how - at this time - to use seriously easy development tools and AI assistants to strip down the overhead to almost nothing, so that the friction involved in getting my thoughts out there goes to an absolute minimum.
One of the reasons Substack works for both writers and readers is that using it involves very little overhead - low friction. But it is not a good place to archive and develop numerous long-term threads of thoughts and interests. For that, you need a website, but people went to Substack at least in part because websites involve a lot of friction, overhead.
At the moment, I think Substack and X should be front-ends for a complex archiving/development website with its own community that may link out to other ways of fostering focused communities, but I have no idea how to harness that net of capabilities without burying myself in overhead and severely limiting my ability to "read and think" on all the stuff I'm interested in.
Your "stuff" is currently spread over many different places, so you can never develop a core place where you can truly create not just more stuff but a true sense of or reflection of *you* as a person, a man of parts, to others who want to take the time, over time, to get to know *you*, not just your position on ghost courts or whatever your topic du jour is that day. I sure hope you can figure that out with low friction. I will copy your techniques with gratitude! :-)
Solve it for yourself, sell the full package, and you will have a huge business!
Is that the same future forecasting of Ed Algier? They're very Doom and gloom of Master overall being the Vatican and royal families, still..?
With total digitization, bringing more control and centralization rather than the opposite? Just checking. I'd love to hear some feedback on that from a different view.
No, BEFisher525, it's not associated with Ad Algier, whom I have not heard of before. Future Forecasting Group is led by Dick Allgire, and they have a lot of different kinds of materials. here is their new website:
I'm a member and recommend them if you are interested in what they cover. There is some negative stuff, but they are more interested in helping people in a lot of different ways, and they enjoy their work.
I, too, have experienced what you’re talking about here. The odd limbo between how we used to work and produce output (articles, books, etc) and where we are now when it feels like a lot of (perhaps) wasted effort to continue to demand that kind of product from ourselves when something more immediate- and often more concise - is available to us. But I think that effort is what’s required as a valid starting place. The true wonderings and wanderings a of a human mind are the fruits of Creation. Whereas AI can only take what already exists and work with that.
I agree that AI (when used properly) can take our thoughts and find the thing at the heart of them that we, ourselves, are trying to express but may be missing…our own forests for our trees.
I don’t know how this all pans out either. But here we are. And we each do the best we can with it, I think.
I’ve been reading your content for years. And your book is in my personal, tangible collection. Thank you for what you do. Your insights and vulnerability throughout this process have helped many people and you are very much appreciated.
I,myself, love and resonate most with your "soul pain" journeys. My experience of the last years is so deeply painful and alienating I sometimes( but not always) think I won't find any equilibrium ever again. It's not that I wish to read about your pain but I feel some connectedness with my journey. I am an empath. Those who are not empaths will never feel and what "we" feel and frankly I wouldn't wish them to. So here we are....
I read every post, regardless of content. Your writing ability is so good that I find it a pleasure to read, even if the subject sometimes isn't something that I'd usually read. And all posts come into my email inbox, regardless of sender/account. And I had my car stolen in Whitby.
Just want to say it is good to share this journey with you.
May God bless each of us with guidance on this journey.
I sense you are germinating something new. Let it grow inwardly first.
I have cast about with Substack, recently deleting all political material and consciously deciding to only put out essays generated by my heart center.
I have imported some of my “inspired writings” because they fit the bill, but it will take a bit of distillation to sense this new direction and produce.
I have always resonated with your “painful soul journeys”, as others have mentioned. The Way is narrow, dark and lonely, and just hearing another’s struggles with that is invaluable.
I was an avid follower of Q in the 2018-2020 period, but now have fallen away from all such pursuits back into radical academic detachment.
But Q was the gestalt in which I found your writings, and that is meaningful.
I got a feeling that you are about to solve the question that you are asking......and it will be glorious. Carry on....onwards and upwards.
Personally, I got most out of your Q articles, and now, your use of AI to fight the corrupt system (for a lack of better words.) Your articles on how to use AI in your court battles have taught me so much and helped me with my legal issue. If you want my two cents, I would like to see more about how to use AI to combat and fight back from the school board level to the national level. Mostly the local level, since most politics and corruption is local.
Besides that, well done Martin. I wish you many successful ventures in the future.
The voice of Q... Good times! The battle goes on. Onward and upward!😁
I enjoy your personal pieces the most, since the struggle is real for all of us so in some ways your journey reflects ours. The longer & sometimes (imo) pretty technical pieces I tend to skip through. What I'm really after is evidence of progress and perhaps even sightings of potential endgame in this now achingly long Q-op saga. I honestly expected the phone to ring by now, with OG anons being contacted by White Hat Military Intel and recruited into paid civilian positions to backfill holes left following cabal arrests, resignations, suicides, etc. Hasn't happened though, has it? Not yet at any rate. So far we have simply been 'used' as an unpaid audience; else who would there be to appreciate and perhaps record the immense effort going into this extended movie? OK, I hope that answers your first two questions. As for the others: 3. I notice 'very little' about how information is being created and used, sorry! 4. Maybe a book ... dunno, I'm such a luddite, lol!?
No topic expectations or preferences here. Enjoy most of your articles regardless. The "man with a van" saga stood out for me.
I like the "mix" of all that you create...and I read most everyone of your posts a.k.a. blogs...then I skip some becuase I am busy focused elsewhere and those get archived. Your adventures into the world of the "courthouse and legalese" along with your, I will call them HOW TOs, methods to get the most and best out of partnerships with AI are quite helpful. I am in agreement that "AI can be a partner in refinement." Long and short of it...all you are doing is accepted with much GRATITUDE!
I once asked one of my brothers what I do in the world, my specific talents. Without hesitation, he said, "You read, and you think." I've been struck since by the *lack* of something he did not say, which is of course, "and you share what you think."
After 6 years of taking care of my elderly mother (who died several weeks ago at the age of 101 years old), I have literally hundreds of tasks and projects that have been postponed, held in abeyance until I (now) can get to them.
Part of what I've been noodling on for some time now (and it is now a current noodling) is how do I take all that I read about ("take in") and think about, and turn it into something useful shared with others, *without* getting totally bogged down in all the "processing" overhead of operating a method of sharing. This is especially an issue because I am a generalist and have many interests, some of which appeal to one group and some of which appeal to other groups.
In reading your post above, I see you voicing similar concerns, though from a much more active and out there situation.
The Future Forecasting Group has recently completely revamped their website (ffgrv.com) to try to solve that problem. And in a lot of ways, I think they have one good way to do it. I keep coming back to the old website approach, where someone can personalize and develop many different threads, but it also needs a space for a community. Even more important, though, the person needs to have AI-level help to remove the massive drudgery that is inherent in the old "personal website" website approach.
I'm currently stopped from adding, "and sharing" to the end of "You read, and you think" because the thought of spending the massive amount of time simply curating the website threatens to derail everything I most want to spend time on. So "and sharing" isn't going to happen any time soon.
I think I need a network that is based on my own (peculiar) website containing a layered community within it, and supported by a network of social media "collection points" to point people toward the many different threads of thought and interest and sharing on the central hub which is the website, which carries 2 functions: archiving all my thoughts/articles/podcasts and providing a place for engagement with readers.
Unfortunately, I don't know how - at this time - to use seriously easy development tools and AI assistants to strip down the overhead to almost nothing, so that the friction involved in getting my thoughts out there goes to an absolute minimum.
One of the reasons Substack works for both writers and readers is that using it involves very little overhead - low friction. But it is not a good place to archive and develop numerous long-term threads of thoughts and interests. For that, you need a website, but people went to Substack at least in part because websites involve a lot of friction, overhead.
At the moment, I think Substack and X should be front-ends for a complex archiving/development website with its own community that may link out to other ways of fostering focused communities, but I have no idea how to harness that net of capabilities without burying myself in overhead and severely limiting my ability to "read and think" on all the stuff I'm interested in.
Your "stuff" is currently spread over many different places, so you can never develop a core place where you can truly create not just more stuff but a true sense of or reflection of *you* as a person, a man of parts, to others who want to take the time, over time, to get to know *you*, not just your position on ghost courts or whatever your topic du jour is that day. I sure hope you can figure that out with low friction. I will copy your techniques with gratitude! :-)
Solve it for yourself, sell the full package, and you will have a huge business!
Is that the same future forecasting of Ed Algier? They're very Doom and gloom of Master overall being the Vatican and royal families, still..?
With total digitization, bringing more control and centralization rather than the opposite? Just checking. I'd love to hear some feedback on that from a different view.
No, BEFisher525, it's not associated with Ad Algier, whom I have not heard of before. Future Forecasting Group is led by Dick Allgire, and they have a lot of different kinds of materials. here is their new website:
https://www.ffgrv.com
I'm a member and recommend them if you are interested in what they cover. There is some negative stuff, but they are more interested in helping people in a lot of different ways, and they enjoy their work.
Thank you for writing that. I have been beyond pleasantly surprised by those small tweaks of perspective and reorganization contributed by AI review.