A compelling piece right up to AI part. I can't get myself to take AI seriously because it loves to make stuff up. It's just not reliable. If you don't catch a false premise it sneaks in or a re-word that turns a logical point flacid, it can really throw you off course. I use it for short rewrites- it's pretty good at that. But you still have to watch every point it makes because it can significantly shift emphasis.
That aside, as soon as Martin is teaching his first Grad-level University Philosophy class, I'm applying! This will ABSOLUTELY be taught someday to normies. Brown University works best geographically for me, please!
"After eight years, I no longer think the most interesting question is “Who is Q?”
I think the more interesting question is:
What kind of hidden runtime could have generated the history we can now observe?
My concluding essay introduces the idea of computational historiography—using AI to compare competing reconstructions of history rather than simply arguing over narratives."
Ever read Asimov's Foundation trilogy?
And actually nothing holds a candle to the astonishing 'future proves past' accomplishments and historical harmonic resonances of the Bible for that matter
This was the moment my jaw hit the deck.....that AWE" moment....my jaw remained decked till the last word.....I am speechless....this is a beauty to behold.
You are priceless....my heart is joyful......a multitude of doors opening all at once........blown away....thanks Marrrrtin xx
Alternative view option: Q a pysop by DS to identify folks not accepting MSM narative. Evil eats its own, therefore some being outed are disposable. Trump 2.0 and goverment agencies are all captured and blackmailed, therefore connecting to Q pysop only confirms continuation of DS active pysop.
As an anon, all options must be assessed.
Good news is God (source/creator) is in control and our path is to lovingly connect for guidance and a good future.
A compelling piece right up to AI part. I can't get myself to take AI seriously because it loves to make stuff up. It's just not reliable. If you don't catch a false premise it sneaks in or a re-word that turns a logical point flacid, it can really throw you off course. I use it for short rewrites- it's pretty good at that. But you still have to watch every point it makes because it can significantly shift emphasis.
That aside, as soon as Martin is teaching his first Grad-level University Philosophy class, I'm applying! This will ABSOLUTELY be taught someday to normies. Brown University works best geographically for me, please!
from your Telegram:
"After eight years, I no longer think the most interesting question is “Who is Q?”
I think the more interesting question is:
What kind of hidden runtime could have generated the history we can now observe?
My concluding essay introduces the idea of computational historiography—using AI to compare competing reconstructions of history rather than simply arguing over narratives."
Ever read Asimov's Foundation trilogy?
And actually nothing holds a candle to the astonishing 'future proves past' accomplishments and historical harmonic resonances of the Bible for that matter
Speaking of ..... this essay of Martin's from almost exactly 3 years ago
https://substack.com/home/post/p-130656544
"That capability will not remain confined to Q.
It changes how we investigate everything else."
This was the moment my jaw hit the deck.....that AWE" moment....my jaw remained decked till the last word.....I am speechless....this is a beauty to behold.
You are priceless....my heart is joyful......a multitude of doors opening all at once........blown away....thanks Marrrrtin xx
Alternative view option: Q a pysop by DS to identify folks not accepting MSM narative. Evil eats its own, therefore some being outed are disposable. Trump 2.0 and goverment agencies are all captured and blackmailed, therefore connecting to Q pysop only confirms continuation of DS active pysop.
As an anon, all options must be assessed.
Good news is God (source/creator) is in control and our path is to lovingly connect for guidance and a good future.
Great Martin. I get down with Q as an institutional reflective mechanism. Q gave me Eye's to see the reaction of various stakeholders.