Six years later, some promising signs of hope
I attended two events on Friday that both highlighted the horror of what we have lived through, as well as the possibility of victory over an unseen evil
A good friend called yesterday morning to tell me he is stepping back from online provocations—social media, chat groups, and the endless stream of outrage—because he no longer wants his life force drained by the relentless exposure to corruption, criminality, and conflict. This is no ordinary man. He served multiple tours in Afghanistan, manning the rear of a Chinook helicopter, and witnessed horrors he rarely speaks about.
Yet psychological and information warfare as a nominal civilian poses its own kind of danger. The threats may be different, but the nervous system does not neatly distinguish between bullets, explosions, and a continual diet of perceived existential threat. Living for years in a heightened state of vigilance extracts a price, regardless of the battlefield.
The losses and wounds are real, if often invisible (such as fracturing the mind via propaganda) or misclassified (poisoning of the body seen as emergent illness).
On Friday I attended two events, one private and one public, featuring speakers who had each, in their own way, awakened to the totalitarian agenda advanced under the banner of Covid. They recognised that something had gone profoundly wrong, experienced its consequences personally, and chose to act rather than look away.
What follows is my field report from near the front lines of that struggle. It is not merely about exposing evil, but about something harder and ultimately more important: reconstructing humanity’s future along more truthful, benevolent, and life-affirming lines.
The first event showcased Fabio Zoffi, an Italian tech entrepreneur who pivoted during the pandemic. He had already realised that the world was not as it presented itself, and that the corruption was architectural, not merely personal. His initial response was to use the tools available: he founded a political party and, using his own money, stood for election as Mayor of Venice.
(Hold that pattern in mind—businessman, politics, self-funding—as we shall return to it.)
That plan disintegrated the moment the lockdowns arrived. Fabio himself became a victim of the “vaccine” (i.e. bioweapon) fraud. Seeking solutions to his injuries, he began investigating mRNA technology, spike proteins, and the presence or absence of any viral threat.
This included obtaining forty vials of the injectable products from three manufacturers and, again using his own money, having them independently analysed. The results showed widespread contamination, but no detectable digital nanotechnology.
Like many of us, he then embarked on a multi-year process of self-re-education. His investigations led him into suppressed frequency technologies—for healing the body, improving crop growth, and combating pests and disease. Underpinning this work are quantum mechanics and the emerging field of quantum biology.
Many readers will already be familiar with the idea that water is an information-carrying molecule with memory, capable of being programmed or structured to exhibit different resonant properties that affect its interaction with living organisms. Fabio began experimenting with these phenomena himself, proving to his own satisfaction the remarkable difference they could make.
A crucial inflection point in his story was meeting Dr Tina Peers, whose testimony I shall recap shortly. She had identified N-acetyl cysteine (NAC)—a “wonder supplement” that many people, myself included, take—as an effective treatment for Covid injuries. This opened the possibility of enhancing the effects of the physical product through quantum resonance mechanisms, whose underlying physics lies well outside my own expertise.
Fabio has since launched the Zero Spike Foundation to promote understanding of spike protein harms, including shedding onto others, as well as Augmented NAC, a healing product based on these same principles.
A pattern that I have observed over the years of dissident work is that testimony has far more power than advocacy. Dr Peers had a long and illustrious conventional medical career in the National Health Service. When Covid came, she saw the purported vaccines came with significant risks, yet decided to take them anyhow in order to continue serving her patients.
The first injection had no tangible effect upon her. The second one seriously damaged her health, with tremors, spasms, narcolepsy, and allergic inflammation. This led her to NAC as a therapy, and it had overnight curative effects. She applied it to patients, and one in particular went from life-destroying seizures on a daily basis to complete remission in as little as a week.
It was impossible for Dr Peers to continue practising medicine in the conventional system that rejected actual cures. I didn’t catch whether she lost her medical license or revoked it herself, but she now practises as a naturopath. This is a common pattern; a “medical mafia” destroys the careers and livelihoods of refusniks of the pharma-industrial complex.
Yet somehow doctors and nurses refuse Covid and flu injections for themselves while still pushing them on patients. How is this not criminal, I do not know.
To complete our report from the first event, Fabio has now turned his attention to agriculture. In Sardinia he is running a “beyond organic” farm as a proof of concept, with his latest innovation centred on what he calls “informed water”.
Take peaches, for example. Delicate crops normally require insecticides for protection, yet many insects naturally avoid substances such as copper. Fabio’s approach is to activate water with the frequency signature of copper—even at a distance (hello, spooky quantum effects)—so that, for a period, it behaves as though it were itself an insect repellent. The principal technical challenge is stabilising the effect for long enough. More remarkably still, this “memory” can then be transferred into much larger volumes of water.
He now uses drones to spray crops with this enhanced water. The resulting fruit is succulent and reminiscent of heritage varieties from before the agrochemical era. Farmers are no longer exposed to highly toxic chemicals, and the crops flourish without them.
Alongside this, Fabio is reviving electroculture, once widely practised before falling out of favour as agriculture became dependent on synthetic fertilisers. Applying a mild electrical current to seeds and growing plants produces dramatic—and, he says, reproducible—improvements in growth.
I had to leave the first event slightly early to point my 59bhp van down the M1 towards London. (It will never be caught speeding, as it is physically incapable of the feat.)
The destination was to hear Andrew Bridgen, the former MP turned anti-corruption campaigner. By happy coincidence, he was the speaker immediately following me at the same monthly event.
I had seen Andrew speak once before, two years earlier, much closer to home in County Durham. You can read my report from that occasion below.
Andrew Bridgen: a modern-day Job?
Yesterday on the Mayan “day out of time” I had a memorable experience watching former politician Andrew Bridgen give a heartfelt and very personal talk on corruption in Britain. The location was Peterlee, which shares the status of having lost its mining industry with Andrew’s constituency of North West Leicestershire. He is a man who experienced materi…
The room was packed, and Andrew gave a lucid recap of his experience exposing the Post Office Horizon scandal, as well as being the only MP who truly and profoundly resisted the Covid vaccine fraud. It cost him almost everything: his business, his career, his fortune, his family, his reputation, and his home. This is a man who has paid the material price of remaining spiritually upright.
In many ways, his talk—which he gives around Britain—is the greatest outlier imaginable for a politician’s memoir. He recounts election fraud in his own constituency. Being offered bribes to keep quiet. How his home was literally demolished while his capital was stripped away. The dirty tricks used to discredit him. How fellow MPs were pressured into submission. The false friends presented to us as reformers who are nothing of the sort. The behind-the-scenes entrapment operations to generate kompromat. The bullying culture inside Parliament. The hidden injection injuries among party loyalists. The counterfeit piety of the religious. The persecution of fellow whistleblowers. The suicides of his constituents during the lockdowns—and how deeply that burden still weighs upon him. You can see the trauma in the man.
Andrew himself is bioweapon-injured—let’s not pretend these are vaccines. He lives with the consequences of having been treated as establishment syringe fodder on the battlefield of fifth-generation warfare. Yet he still turns up, whatever the personal cost.
The talk was not recorded, and there is one especially barbaric incident that he recounts which I shall leave untold. If you want to hear it for yourself, he is speaking in my area again next weekend. We are confronting a ruthless evil; of that I have no doubt.
One pattern stands out when I compare Andrew with Fabio. Both are businessmen prepared to put their own resources, their own names, and ultimately their own lives on the line for what they believe. Andrew largely self-funded his political activities because the Conservative Party had written off his constituency as unwinnable. He may have lost the fortune accumulated through his family business, but in doing so he became a genuinely free man, able to speak without fear of further material loss. As he himself observes, they have already done almost everything they can to him. Anything more starts to become rather too obvious. Even so, he recounts being warned by a former police officer that “problematic” people are sometimes removed by means that remain comfortably within the bounds of plausible deniability.
Sometimes the secondary aspects of an event are as revealing as the main performance.
At the first event, security was a genuine concern. Extremely powerful interests stand to lose a great deal if their products, profits, and reputations are shown to rest upon fraud or manipulation of the scientific record.
At the second event, many of the audience questions wandered. One elderly gentleman—perhaps eighty going on eight—demanded his money back because he had not been given an extended opportunity to air his own beliefs.
Yet what stayed with me came right at the end. After speaking at length about Ukraine, transhumanism, domestic tyranny, and much else—and receiving three loud cheers from the audience—Andrew remarked, almost in passing, “We will win.”
That is not the language of a conventional politician. It is the language of an unconventional warrior engaged in an irregular war. The adversary is not Russia, but a network of evil operating largely in the shadows, much of which may never fully reveal itself.
The shock of the violence inflicted during Covid—and the subsequent official amnesia—still lingers. Many of us carry invisible wounds, waiting for a day when justice is finally done.
What struck me about both events was not simply their critique of the present, but their confidence about the future. The reality of what has happened is now understood by enough people. Enough men and women have stood up, found one another, and begun building the relationships needed to carry society through whatever revelatory stress still lies ahead. The tools needed to reconstruct a better civilisation are no longer merely imagined; they are already being developed and deployed.
Fabio and Andrew are both national leaders, yet neither holds high office nor required official anointment. Their standing comes from what they have chosen to be and what they have chosen to do, not from a title, institution, or bestowed identity.
Throughout both events, I found myself thinking, “These are the people future historians will write about.” Yet what is equally striking is their ordinariness. Neither projects perfection. Both carry scars. Both have paid heavily for the path they chose.
We were all deceived and harmed under Covid.
Now those consequences have to be confronted.
There is reason to be hopeful.
Good people acted.




What Andrew doesn't seem to get is that if the people he is clearly having a dig at came out in 2020 and told everyone COVID was a giant scam and the 'vax' is a bioweapon we would be no closer to breaking the system politically than we were back then. The 'reformers' would have been destroyed politically. It's no different to the way Trump had to deal with it. If the truth was told at time barely any one would have believed it. I like Andrew a lot but I think he's a little naive politically. Andrew may have a clear conscious but a clear conscious isn't going to help us out of this corrupt hellscape.